Note - I am a colder sleeper. This means that
I need a bag rated at a cooler temperature than some to keep warm at any given temperature. I know from many miserable, cold nights that I need to add 6
Celsius to an otherwise accurately rated bag. To be clear - If I want a bag to
keep me warm at 0 Celsius then I need to be looking at bags rated around -6 Celsius.
Bare that in mind when reading the review and particularly anything to do with
temperature ratings. Unfortunately finding out if you are a cold or warm
sleeper can be an expensive and sometimes cold experience! Quilts generally don’t have
hoods and you will need additional head protection at cooler temperatures. I usually wear a light down hat when it's below 10 Celsius. When comparing
quilts to hooded bags take that additional weight into consideration.
Commercial
quilts have never really worked for me. My first experience was with a Nunatak Arc Ghost and while this is a fine example, as a side sleeper, I didn’t
find it wide enough which made it a cold and draughty experience for me. I soon sold it on. Undeterred I started making
my own and converted one of my PHD “design your own” bags into a wearable,
hooded quilt. As this was a bag in its pervious life the width was far greater
than is normal for commercial quilts. I found it worked so well that I converted my other
2 PHD bags into wearable quilts also. I was sold on the principle.
In
Oct 11 I noticed that Z-Packs had released their own range of sleeping bags that
were incredibly light for the quoted ratings. How could these bags be so much lighter
than the competition? The weight of a bag for a given temperature rating can
only change due to the materials, filling, design or size. All bags using similar
materials and fillings, and of equivalent size, should weigh about the same. How then
could these bags be so light? Was the temperature rating exaggerated? Perhaps
they were extra small? No, the quoted fill and loft from the website looked accurate. Length
was as you would expect. Width was excellent and material specification first-rate. How then was Z-Packs able to produce a bag so light for that given
temperature rating? The only option remaining was the design. Intrigued I
investigated further.
A standard
bag from Z-Packs comes with a very light 0.7oz TenD nylon inner but a heavier 0.95oz
Pertex Quantum nylon shell. 0.34oz cuben fibre baffles and 850fp down (since upgraded to 900fp US standard, which has less loft than the equivalent European rating) complete the specification. A unique feature is its 3/4 length centre zip that you lay on. This allows you to close up and use as a bag when it's cold but open up like a
quilt when warmer, best of both worlds perhaps? This sounded like a good idea
but I hate zips! Zips are troublesome, unreliable devices that jam, snag and
eventually fail. I keep away from zips
whenever possible. At that time a zipless bag, or quilt, wasn’t an option (it
is now) and I wanted the bag to be as light as possible so I asked Joe if it
would be possible to get a 20deg (-7 Celsius), long length, regular width,
zipless bag with a 0.7oz TenD Shell instead of the Quantum. No problem he said!
Cost was a reasonable $340 + $20 for those modifications + $29 shipping giving a total of $389 in 2011.
The
bag arrived a couple of weeks later in a very nice black Cuben Fibre stuff sack,
just in time for winter. As this was bought as a 0 Celsius 3 season thruhiking
bag (read note at top) it only got used a couple of times before being put away
until warmer weather. Those cool early tests did allow me to confirm that the
temperature ratings specified on the website were accurate, which was pleasing,
but it also showed up the one major flaw with this bag (read on). Weight of the
bag was an impressive 480g and 20g for the stuff sack (not used). Total weight 500g compared to an advertised weight of 513g.
Quality
is excellent. Materials and construction are first rate. I’m picky here and I
wasn’t able to find fault with the stitching or materials and after 60 nights of use on both
my Scottish Cycling Tour and Coast & Moor hikes, along with some shorter
trips, no manufacturing or material problems have shown up. Filling is harder to
judge, loft is excellent but down leakage is about average. Many days there will be a
feather or 2 sticking out of the fabric. I grab these from the opposite side and pull
them bag into the bag; I don’t want to loose any precious down! The very light
shell fabrics, or the quality of the down could be the cause of this leakage.
My PHD bags almost never leak down even in the lightest MX fabrics, but
previous bags from Nunatak and RAB leaked more down than the Z-Packs. Overall I
would say the down is good but not as good as the exceptional PHD’s 900fp European down. Z-Packs are now using 900fp down which may or may not be of higher quality. One of
the ways weight has been saved is by using Cuben Fibre for the baffles. I was
slightly concerned how this would hold up long-term after repeated stuffing and
un-stuffing into sacks, and also if it would attract condensation within the
bag. So far there has been nothing to worry about, the baffles have held up
fine and there has been no noticeable lofting problems caused by damp down. I
do wonder how much weight is actually saved by this choice of material though.
The light TenD shell and inner fabric isn’t showing any signs of wear and
appears to be very breathable and resistant to minor water spills. I dislike
waterproof shells on my bags, in my experience they resist lofting and the
reduced breathability causes more dampness problems than it ever solves. I want
the lightest, most breathable, shells available and the TenD fabric is certainly
up there with the very best.
At
1.88cm and 69 kg I’m tall and skinny so went for a long length, regular width
bag. As a side sleeper I have found the width to be excellent and it’s possible
to get a draft free seal all the way around the quilt without much bother. This
is the advantage of a quilt that’s been designed as a bag; they are just so
much wider than normal! Length is just acceptable for me but ideally I would
want another 3-5cm. The website recommends a long bag for individuals up to
6”2, or 185cm, well I’m 6”2 but 188cm! Those 3cm make a difference. If you are 188cm
or taller then I would see about getting an even longer version.
Additional
features are limited but it has an elasticated drawcord around the neck to keep
out drafts. This uses Velcro to secure the two ends of the quilt together and I
haven’t found it to work very well. Any movement would easily cause the 2 ends to
pull apart so I added a mitten hook to the upper loops, which has been much more
successful. Additional loops are fitted all the way down the quilt so it’s
possible to link them all together and seal the quilt up very much like a bag if
you should wish. I’ve not done this and no clips or cord are supplied.
So
we know that the Z-Packs bags use high quality materials, sizing is overall very
good and that the temperature rating is accurate. How then do they get it so light and what
was the flaw that I mentioned earlier?
Z-Packs
have saved weight by effectively removing the standard foot-box found on a
conventional bag. It is tiny! If you are a back sleeper then I think this bag
will not work for you as there is nowhere to put your feet without completely
crushing the upper loft, and that will guarantee you cold feet.
As a side or
front sleeper that isn’t so much a problem and I found that my feet naturally
angled down into the bag without crushing the down much. Back sleepers beware!
Also, and this is the flaw with this bag, there is an un-baffled, read - stitched
through, seam running right across the lower foot-box of the bag. This really affects
the warmth of the foot area when pushed near to its rated limit. On those early
winter tests I had cold feet when the rest on me was still toasty warm. Before
you write the Z-Packs bag off there is a solution and it is certainly possible
to live with this flaw. Stuffing an item of spare clothing into the foot-box,
or wearing some insulated socks if you are going to be pushing the bag works
well. For me, I’m happy down to around 5 Celsius without any additional
insulation but if I want to get the full 0 Celsius out of it then I need to
push my down jacket into the foot-box.
In
summary this is a high quality, premium material bag, that can be converted into
an excellent quilt for side sleepers if wanted. The ratings are accurate but
because of the design additional protection might be needed for your feet. Price is also good considering what you are getting. The weight is incredible for the rating but
that comes at a price with that tiny foot-box. For my use, as a 3-season thruhiking
bag that will normally be used in above freezing temperatures, then this is a compromise
I’m willing to accept.
*UPDATE FEB 2013*
Joe from Z-Packs has commented that the problems I found with this quilt have been rectified. The foot-box is wider and now has a baffled seam. This is excellent news and takes this quilt to the top of the pile for me.
But be warned...
Unfortunately this quilt suffered a blown seam on my cycle tour of Tasmania. Read this review in conjunction with this and make your own judgement.
*UPDATE FEB 2013*
Joe from Z-Packs has commented that the problems I found with this quilt have been rectified. The foot-box is wider and now has a baffled seam. This is excellent news and takes this quilt to the top of the pile for me.
But be warned...
Unfortunately this quilt suffered a blown seam on my cycle tour of Tasmania. Read this review in conjunction with this and make your own judgement.